The FBI, with the help of Anonymous’ #Op SafeKids , is asking people to please take a close look at the images of this child rapist caught on cam abusing a little boy.
The FBI is asking for help tracking down a man accused of sexually abusing and exploiting a child.
The suspect, who is being called John Doe 28, is shown in photos and video engaging in sexually explicit acts with a child. It was first recorded by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in November 2012.
Now, images of the suspect are being released across the country in hopes of tracking him down.
He appears to be a white man, possibly in his 30s or 40s, with a receding hairline and wire-framed glasses.
He was seen wearing a burgundy T-shirt with what appeared to be a shark logo on the left side.
In one video, a blue sofa chair and a picture hanging on the wall were visible in the background.
There are currently no specific details linking the suspect to a particular state or region of the U.S., according to the FBI.
He is being sought as part of the FBI’s Operation Rescue Me and Endangered Child Alert Program.
Anyone with information about the suspect is asked to call 1-800-CALL-FBI or leave a tip online at https://tips.fbi.gov.
(***Second Update: Addendum added at bottom as rebuttal to homosexuality argument*** 9/15/2011)
(***Update at bottom of article***)
In the event this atrocity has slipped by you, the pedophiles and their buddies in the medical community are at it again. I’m speaking, of course, about their pathetic attempt to list pedophilia as simply a misunderstood sexual orientation, liking it to homosexuality and comparing the public’s view of pedophiles as has been the intolerance suffered by the gay and lesbian community (This should outrage GLAAD as much as the rest of us). There is a conference aiming at normalizing pedophilia. This time, however, this sadistic movement is getting much wider coverage and won’t be some secret mission hidden from the normal people in society who can and will stand up against it.
I would normally only post a few clippings here and have my readers follow the link to the full story; however, this is far too important to have you skipping back and forth. Here is what was planned for August 17, 2011:
By John Rossomando – The Daily Caller Published: 10:00 AM 08/15/2011 | Updated: 4:38 PM 08/15/2011
If a small group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals have their way at a conference this week, pedophiles themselves could play a role in removing pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s bible of mental illnesses — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), set to undergo a significant revision by 2013. Critics warn that their success could lead to the decriminalization of pedophilia.
The August 17 Baltimore conference is sponsored by B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists. According to the conference brochure, the event will examine “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.
Researchers from Harvard University, the Johns Hopkins University, the University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois will be among the panelists at the conference.
B4U-ACT has been active attacking the APA’s definition of pedophilia in the run up to the conference, denouncing its description of “minor-attracted persons” as “inaccurate” and “misleading” because the current DSM links pedophilia with criminality.
“It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law-abiding,” said Howard Kline, science director of B4U-ACT, in a July 25, 2011 press release. “The proposed new diagnostic criteria specify ages and frequencies with no scientific basis whatsoever.”
The press release announced a letter the group sent to the APA criticizing its approach, and inviting its leaders to participate in the August 17 conference. “The DSM should meet a higher standard than that,” Kline continued. “We can help them, because we are the people they are writing about.”
APA spokeswoman Erin Connors told The Daily Caller in an emailed statement that her organization was not participating in the conference and would not comment on its aims.
Child advocate Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting professor at Liberty University’s School of Law, said the conference is part of a strategy to condition people into accepting pedophiles.
“The first thing they do is to get the public to divest from thinking of what the offender does criminally, to thinking of the offender’s emotional state, to think of him as thinking of his emotional state, [and] to empathize and sympathize,” Reisman said. “You don’t change the nation in one fell swoop; you have to change it by conditioning. The aim is to get them [pedophiles] out of prison.”
According to Reisman, empirical data show that pedophiles typically molest many children before finally being caught.
“The data on paroled pedophiles confirms these predators repeat their crimes against children and are known to have escalated them even to murder,” Reisman said.
Several speakers at the August 17 conference, including B4U-ACT director of operations Dr. Richard Kramer and conference keynote speaker Dr. Fred Berlin, of the Johns Hopkins University, have actively opposed sex offender notification laws.
“What purpose does calling someone a ‘pervert’ or ‘predator’ serve anyway, other than to express contempt and hatred?” Kramer wrote in a March 14, 2009 blog entry on the website ReformSexOffenderLaws.org. “How is this productive? It certainly doesn’t protect children. I would urge all SO [sex offender] activists to listen to their own message: Stop buying into and promoting false stereotypes. Stop demonizing a whole class of people, and start learning the facts.”
Berlin has similarly compared society’s reaction to pedophilia to that of homosexuality prior to the landmark 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision that decriminalized sodomy.
B4U-ACT’s own website puts Berlin’s views front and center. “Just as has been the case historically with homosexuality,” he writes, “society is currently addressing the matter of pedophilia with a balance that is far more heavily weighted on the side of criminal justice solutions than on the side of mental health solutions.”
Berlin’s opposition to, and even noncompliance with, Maryland’s sex offender notification law drew scrutiny from former Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran in the early 1990s.
In 1990 The Baltimore Sun reported that Berlin refused to report pedophiles under his care who were actively molesting children.
In an emailed statement to TheDC, Berlin distanced himself Monday afternoon from other B4U-ACT conference participants’ stated aims, saying that he opposes removing pedophilia from the DSM and that he hopes to stop pedophiles before they act.
Berlin also disputed Reisman’s contention that he wants to decriminalize pedophilia, noting that “society’s interests can best be served by supporting both criminal justice interventions and public health initiatives.”
Reisman remains unconvinced. “His empathy was with the pedophile and the pederast, not with the child victim,” she told TheDC. “He refused to report the criminal to law enforcement because he said they were in treatment.
“Taxpayers pay for treatment and they are molesting kids. They go out to Berlin, and he gets paid by us [the taxpayers] for therapy.”
Reisman also claims that mental health practitioners like Berlin want to place pedophilia on a par with neuroses or clinical depression, and counsel pedophiles rather than incarcerate them.
“The scientific defense of pedophiles follows on the natural outgrowth of … [Alfred Kinsey’s] 1948 book ‘Sexual Behavior of the Human Male’ where he describes the rapes of infants and children, as would any pedophile, as ‘orgasmic,’” Reisman said.
Reisman warns that declassifying pedophilia as a mental illness could result in the repeal of child-protection statutes because the law always follows the input of psychiatry. She points to psychiatry’s normalization of sadomasochism, exhibitionism, and homosexuality as precedents.
“[I]t has been carried from the university to the law, going back to Kinsey,” Reisman said.
And other conference panelists such as Jacob Breslow, a graduate student in gender research at the London School of Economics, plan to discuss how political activists can exploit removing pedophilia from the next edition of the DSM for their own ends.
“Allowing for a form of non-diagnosable minor attraction is exciting, as it creates a sexual or political identity by which activists, scholars and clinicians can better understand Minor Attracted Persons,” Breslow writes in a summary of his upcoming August 17 presentation.
“This understanding may displace the stigma, fear and objection that is naturalized as being attached to Minor Attracted Persons and may alter the terms by which non-normative sexualities are known.
I don’t call my site “The Ultimate Evil” for nothing, the same as Andrew Vachss who called his child sex slavery novel the name first.
This is what we know to be “Grooming.” Yes, pedophiles groom society the same way they groom children, though with a different desired outcome. They groom children to be complacant in their sexual abuse and to be too afraid to tell. They groom parents to accept their steadily increasing interest in their child. They groom society to accept their sexual abuse of children by first desensitizing the public (via jokes about child rape, images mocking child rape, mocking the fight against predators, demonizing television shows and news specials aimed at taking down predators, etc..), then by introducing themselves as sick or past victims who need help, until finally the only victim in their crime is the abuser him/herself.
I have had many pedophiles try to groom me and other visitors with their “oh, woe is me” comments. It has never worked. Now that this conference has taken place, I’m seeing an even slicker crowd come forth.
I just received a comment on an earlier post exposing pedophile codes and symbols by this … interesting … individual. I find it interesting that it comes on the heels of the current push to normalize pedophilia, beginning with the grooming by the pedophile community of society to show “compassion and understanding” for the abusers rather than the victims. Isn’t that what the multi-million dollar state of the art rehab centers for baby rapers are for? I can’t help but to ask yet again when victims are going to get such compassion and understanding. You know, because logic and reason dictate that in order to effectively stop the cycle of abuse, the victim must receive help as soon as possible to cope and to heal. Wouldn’t the only reason to give so much coddling to a criminal who has already created many victims, thus ensuring the continuation and expansion of the cycle of abuse, be to simply help them avoid prison?
But my intelligence and I digress…. where were we? Ah, yes. A comment by a pedophile sympathizer:
Submitted on 2011/08/26 at 5:59 pm
Whoa, that’s a lot of misplaced hatred.
Should people who rape children be sent to prison? Personally I’m more in favor of execution in instances in which guilt can be established without doubt. Why risk repeat offense?
But listen, pedophiles are not necessarily child rapists.
I knew a pedophile I respected immensely because he understood that his desires were wrong, and vowed to never, ever act on them. A tortured life to lead, but a noble one.
We may never be able to eliminate pedophilia in the sense of sexual attraction to children, but we can eliminate sexual abuse of children by teaching these people to control their urges.
Hatred for them will not help them. When they do offend, they must be permanently removed from society, and either used as slave labor, for medical experimentation, or put to death.
Not out of hatred, but necessity. If anything, compassion for them and others.
The reason some of those lines are in bold is to help you read between the lines and see the true intent of this comment. It is quite obvious this author is only after convincing me to “care about” and “understand” pedophiles. He even goes so far as to call them respectable and noble!
Let me explain something in the event you don’t already know: Pedophiles NEVER avoid children! That is an outright lie. And by the time an abuser is caught, he or she has already abused many others he groomed into silence. There has never been a case of which I am aware that a pedophile was caught the very first time he raped or molested a child. I have heard of young pedophiles being afraid of their feelings and telling someone before acting upon them. By the time a pedophile is actually caught for sexual abuse, though, they already have a history of doing so.
Pedophile sympathizers like Ambrose want us to care instead of hate. Honestly, do you really need any more proof as to the state of someone’s mind when they chastise people for hating those who rape children?
To be honest, though, I see what he is saying. In closing, let me share the wisdom of his suggestions:
Teaching pedophiles to control their urges:
Why, I can almost guarantee any thought of sex with children would suddenly become such a terror, most pedophiles would be cured! Ambrose and the pedophile loving psychos may be on to something.
And for those who are too ill for compassion and deterrants to work, there is always
For those extra tough cases involving groups of poor lost pedophiles, such as NAMBLA, there’s a
Community Rehabilitation Plan
There was an excellent show on B.A.C.A. Nation Radio last night featuring guest Dr. Judith Reisman, “scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,” an “international expert witness on human sexuality,” and an attendee at the above pro-pedophilia conference. Upon looking through information about pedophile supporter and keynote speaker at the conference, Dr. Fred Berlin (founder of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic), I found an article which outlined some of the remarks made on pamphlets, by pedophile attendees, and by speakers like Berlin:
- Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society.
- There was concern about “vice-laden diagnostic criteria” and “cultural baggage of wrongfulness.”
- “We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.”
- “Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult.
- “In Western culture sex is taken too seriously.”
- “Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and ‘Puritanical’]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They’ve always been able to have sex at any age.”
- An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.”
- Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.”
- “Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization.”
- “These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.”
- A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
- Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to that witnessed at the conference, rather than scientific considerations that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said.
- Dr. Berlin appeared to endorse the politically maligned clinical practice of “reparative therapy” for homosexuals and pedophiles alike, saying, “If someone, for their own reasons, doesn’t want to live a homosexual lifestyle, I tell them that it’s hard but I’ll try to help them.”
- The DSM ignores those pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adult heterosexuals and homosexuals have romantic feelings for one another.
- “The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational.”
- The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the pedophile, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.”
- Self-described “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault. [I strongly urge GLAAD to place as much distance as possible between them and this “self-descrived gay activist”, and I remind everyone that sexual abusers in certain religious cults claim their god or their prophet tells them to marry and fornicate with children.]
The author of the article, Nathan Tabor, attempted to call Johns Hopkins Hospital Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and inquire as to their knowledge of their professor’s favoritism for sexually abusing children. Although the person on the other end claimed not to know anything about it, they didn’t seem to take the call seriously. Mr. Tabor published the contact information for Berlin’s boss, Dr. J. Raymond DePaulo- director of the Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences department at John’s Hopkins, in the event those of us intellectually superior to pedophiles would like to share their opinions and concerns:
J. Raymond DePaulo, Jr., M.D.
Henry Phipps Professor and Director
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
“I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients
according to my ability and my judgment
and never do harm to anyone.”
***Addendum – 9-15-2011***
I received a comment by a pedophile last week that I sent directly to spam due to my refusal to participate in useless repetitive arguing. However, the comment caused me to re-read my article and the conversation with the previous pedophile sympathizer in the comments below. I came to realize that I left this post open to speculation regarding the connection with pedophilia and homosexuality. I would like to correct that unintentional oversight and express my feelings more clearly on the matter.
Pedophiles and their ilk frequently attempt to compare pedophilia with homosexuality. They want people to see them as victims of bigotry, ostracized by a small-minded public that is trying to force its ethical or religious will upon everyone. The so-called psychiatrists that are the subjects of this post lead their pedophile brethren in this attempt to psychologically manipulate society.
Never forget that these people have been trained to garner emotions and control how we feel and respond to any given situation. They know they are logically and academically incorrect in the comparison of pedophilia with homosexuality, but they realize not all of society has a medical degree, particularly in psychiatry, and the easily manipulated media certainly doesn’t take the time to research such things from a scientific point of view.
These people are counting on our gullibility and outright stupidity. Our children and generations to come are counting on us to use intelligence, rational thinking, and good old fashioned common sense.
Here is what we know to be fact:
Homosexuality is a mistake of nature, but it is, none-the-less, part of nature.
The primary purpose for intercourse is to breed and continue on the population of a species. The sensation of pleasure exists to ensure the species finds the activity acceptable enough to perform, thereby ensuring the survival of the species. If you don’t like something, you usually don’t do it, particularly if it is painful or unpleasant. For a species to continue thriving, breeding must occur.
In nature, some species rely upon forced copulation. Humans, however, have evolved beyond such primitive behavior. We can communicate with words, we can create with tools and electricity, we understand reason, and we understand that violence against another for selfish reasons is counterproductive to our evolution. We reason, theorize, experiment, and conclude based upon science instead of simply behaving as instinct in the wild dictates. This is why consensual sex is part of our ever evolving species, and heterosexual relations are necessary and normal for our kind. It is true, then, that homosexuality is not normal and it is not as nature intended us to be because it interrupts our species progression.
How, then, do we handle homosexuals and homosexuality?
Being part of a species that has evolved as I stated previously includes understanding that those born with this infliction should not be punished for that which they had no opportunity or ability to oppose. Regardless of a person’s opinion about sexual orientation, we can all agree that everyone deserves human contact in the form of affection, and human interactions that include love.
One can argue in defense of their disapproval with homosexuality, but any argument they present should be formed after they have learned the facts of homosexuality. Any effective argument in their favor must include facts and not opinion. The truth of the matter is, arguments against homosexuals do not treat the individuals as separate entities from the orientation. Furthermore, arguments against homosexuals and homosexuality have been driven by religious leanings rather than science and academic findings. We cannot impose our religious beliefs onto others. Religion is not a necessary item in our species’ growth and evolution. It is purely for spiritual growth and the presumed impact such growth has on the growth of humanity (which is another experiment altogether, and although fascinating to me, does not pertain to this article).
Judging homosexuals and homosexuality, then, from strictly a scientific perception, we see that same-sex intercourse may not be beneficial to the evolutionary cycle of mankind or the promotion of the species’ population, but consensual relations between humans at a stage in their physical and mental growth that can accept such a relationship and its consequences does no harm to the species as it cannot encourage the genes that would normally be passed on through heterosexual intercourse.
When we discuss consensual sexual relations and the affect consent vs. force has upon the human race, then associate the discussion with those who have sex with children, we see that pedophilia is quite different from homosexuality in that only pedophilia truly harms the species with a much greater impact.
Taking the identical points made in the paragraphs pertaining to homosexuality, we know based upon scientific study through psychological testing and physical examinations that pedophilia does harm the human race and attempts to halt its intellectual evolution, which will in turn begin to erode the population.
Sexual abuse on children results in a psychological break down of a child’s intellect. Common knowledge is that a child generally stops or dramatically slows down their mental maturity at the time they are abused. If a 25 year old was sexually assaulted at 6, that 25 year old will show signs of behaving as a 6 year old. The severity of exhibiting such behavior will depend upon how often the person was abused and for how long it lasted. Let us say this 25 year old becomes pregnant by another 25 year old who was beaten every day from the time he could walk until puberty. Both parents will not only lack proper parenting skills, they will, also, pass on genes that include a slowed mental development. Perhaps during the young woman’s sexual abuse, she developed a sexually transmitted disease or other physical traumas. These can affect the pregnancy, growth of the fetus, birth, and perhaps even life of the child if these things were passed on to him while inside of the womb.
Most pedophiles were sexually abused as children. They encourage the cycle of abuse by not fighting any psychological defect that compels them to have sexual relations with a child. This cycle grows to include other children, more and more over time as each child grows into a possible pedophile and creates their own family tree of victims.
The damage here is twofold: Since female children are not yet fertile, and since a male child cannot get a woman pregnant, sexual relations with children hurts the population growth. Additionally, each child that is coerced or physically forced into sexual relations with an adult will develop severe psychological problems that will be counterproductive to the species’ social growth.
Children are, also, not mentally prepared to accept the emotional weight of a sexual relationship or intellectually developed enough to understand sex. Adults get into relationships with other adults sometimes with a mutual understanding that it is only a sexual relationship. They are both responsible for their actions and decision to engage in such a situation. Adults who prey upon children expect us to believe that a child can 1. make an informed decision to agree to such a relationship, and 2. are capable of understanding and being in control of any emotional involvement, such as the love a pedophile claims to have for the child he or she is sexually abusing.
Physically speaking, children are not developed to accept sexual intercourse with an adult. For an adult to accomplish this, there must be force of some kind – be it physical or psychological manipulation. (And here we see that since both physical and psychological force are illegal, this leaves no possible defense of pedophilia.)
Although a child is not responsible for what an adult does, an adult is responsible for their actions when they become old enough to understand the consequences of those actions. Whereas homosexuality is not a choice and does not greatly impact the evolution of the species because it does not create more non-productive homosexuals, pedophilia is always a choice when acted upon and causes great damage to the species’ in numerous ways.
I hope this clears up the factual side of this argument as I will no longer entertain those intolerant of the truth.
On a more opinionated note, though still factual in its sense, the comparison of homosexuality and pedophilia infuriates me because, for one, it compares consensual sex between adults to forced sex between adults and children. Next, I have seen the harm anti-gay activism can do to the war on child sexual abuse.
There is an alarming number of people who insist upon indicating that pedophilia pertains to men raping boys, claiming it is a gay crime. They like to cite groups such as North American Man Boy Love Association, even though there are more groups designed for men who desire little girls and even women who desire little boys. This hurts our cause tremendously because the truth is, there are more cases of opposite-gender assaults than same-sex. By the argument of these anti-gay groups, all heterosexuals must then be child molesters based upon the statistics placing heterosexual child abuse cases above homosexual ones. Since the number of children who suffer abuse by an adult of the opposite sex outnumber those who suffer by an adult of the same gender, the majority of victims are being forgotten and ignored. Personally, I have no doubt that this is one of the many reasons these pedophile psychiatrists are trying to compare their movement to homosexuality. It creates more anti-gay followers and puts the emphasis on homosexuality rather than child sexual assault.
“Amazon.com believes it is censorship not to sell certain titles because we believe their message is objectionable. Therefore, we’ll continue to make controversial works available in the United States and everywhere else, except where they’re prohibited by law.” — Amazon.com’s past response to attempts to stop Amazon.com from selling pedophile books.
Amazon.com has come under fire for years because of its unabashed pedophile marketing. They have protected, in their words, the freedom of speech for some of the most notorious pedophiles known to law enforcement: NAMBLA, Thomas O’Carroll, Viamund the Rake, and Geoffrey Leonard ¹. Through the progress from familiar literature in paper form to the new technological advances of books in digital, Amazon.com even offers such publications on its Kindle — the same device now being marketed to children for the Christmas season.
Should you not understand the content of pedophile literature, know that it involves but is not limited to personal accounts of child rape, a guide to the best targets, instructions on how to groom children and their caregivers, instructions on how to rape and molest a child without leaving noticeable damage or injuries that can be explained through believable means, excuses to tell others who are suspicious of your attention to a particular child or behavior they witness from you in the presence of a child, etc…
It is the most recent novel of this kind that finally made Amazon.com’s coddling of child rapists national headlines:
An e-book that was for sale on Amazon.com that appeared to defend pedophilia has sparked hundreds of angry user comments and threats to boycott the online retailer unless it pulled the title.
A listing for “The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure: A Child-Lover’s Code of Conduct” was no longer available on Amazon.com late Wednesday.
Before then, more than 2,000 users had commented on the title. The lion’s share deplored its publication and vowed to boycott Amazon until it removed the self-published title from the site, and at least two Facebook pages have been dedicated to boycotting Amazon because of the book.
The stated content appears to violate two of Amazon’s content guidelines for digital publication.
The author of the controversial tome said he publised it to address what he considers unfair portrayals of pedophiles in the media.
“True pedophiles love children and would never hurt them,” Phillip R. Greaves II said in a phone interview with CNN on Wednesday.
When asked if the self-published e-book was a “how-to manual,” he said, “there are certain parts that are advisory,” which set out lines that should not be crossed.
“Penetration is out. You can’t do that with a child, but kissing and fondling I don’t think is that big of a problem,” he said.
The Pueblo, Colorado, man told CNN that he has not had sexual contact with a child as an adult, but did when he was a teenager. He also said he “was introduced to oral sex when I was 7” by an older female but did not provide specifics.
In the title’s Amazon.com product description, Greaves described it as “my attempt to make pedophile situations safer for those juveniles that find themselves involved in them, by establishing certian [sic] rules for these adults to follow.
“I hope to achieve this by appealing to the better nature of pedosexuals, with hope that their doing so will result in less hatred and perhaps liter [sic] sentences should they ever be caught,” he said.
Most users who commented on the title said they deplored its publication and vowed to boycott Amazon until it removed the title.
“It is ILLEGAL to molest children, and for Amazon to promote such is insane. I’m an abuse survivor, and am OUTRAGED Amazon would choose to promote this nonsense. I will not be purchasing anything from your website until this is removed,” one user wrote in a comment echoed by others.
It is interesting to note that he claims penetration is not acceptable when penetration almost always follows fondling in child sexual assault cases. At any rate, he is just one of many outspoken sexual abusers of children who have sold and do still sell books and media on Amazon.com and Amazon Kindle.
Amazon.com, also, sells “The Good Witch’s Bible,” a publication I have blogged about which goes into detail describing the necessity of parents to rape their children to prepare them to become witches (*behavior is not a true part of Paganism, Wicca, or true witchcraft). They have sold “Rapeplay,” as well, a video game in which the player must rape women and children for achievements.
I’ve known about the Boycott Amazon.com movement for years and fully supported it. I’ve, also, been disheartened that it was not known by many and Amazon.com continued to flourish on the backs of children — literally. Now, finally, justice is being served! Yes, this is just one publication of so many protected and sold by Amazon.com, but this one incident has broken the dam holding back Amazon.com’s dirty little secret and the world is suddenly aware that Amazon.com and Amazon Kindle is the unofficial pedophile book store!
Here are some contacts at Amazon.com should you feel compelled to let them know we aren’t ignorant to their long time practice, that this is just a publicity stunt, and that this boycott is VERY real and will continue until all pedophile publications of any type and be it through Amazon.com or Amazon Kindle or other apps and anything else they own and govern be removed permanently:
(Information as of 2/2009 gathered by Absolute Zero United
Amazon.coms board of directors:
– Jeffrey Bezos, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board firstname.lastname@example.org – Tom Alberg, Madrona Venture Group email@example.com – John Seely Brown, Visiting Scholar and Advisor to the Provost at USC firstname.lastname@example.org – John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers email@example.com – William B. Gordon, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers firstname.lastname@example.org – Alain Monié, Ingram Micro Inc. email@example.com
– Myrtle Potter, Myrtle Potter and Company, LLC firstname.lastname@example.org – Thomas Ryder, Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. email@example.com – Patricia Stonesifer, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
firstname.lastname@example.org – Andrew Jassy, Senior Vice President, Web Services email@example.com – Steven Kessel, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Digital Media firstname.lastname@example.org – Marc Onetto, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Operations email@example.com – Diego Piacentini, Senior Vice President, International Retail firstname.lastname@example.org – Shelley Reynolds, Vice President, Wordwide Controller and Principal Accounting Officer email@example.com or
– Jeff Wilke, Senior Vice President, North America Retail firstname.lastname@example.org – Thomas Szkutak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Other high-level Amazon.com staff:
|email@example.com||– Werner Vogels, Chief Technology Officer and Vice President of Amazon.com|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||– Adam Selipsky, Vice President|
|email@example.com||– Steve Rabuchin, Director|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||– Ian Freed, Vice President, Digital|
|email@example.com||– Michelle Wilson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||– Sam Wheeler, Director, Advertising & Partnerships|
|email@example.com||– Bill Carr, Vice President, Digital Media|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||– Jinesh Varia, Web Services Evangelist|
|email@example.com||– Colin Bodell, Vice President, Platform Operations of Amazon.com|
|firstname.lastname@example.org||– Mike Culver, Web Services Evangelist|
|– Jeff Barr, Lead Web Services Evangelist|
|– Simone Brunozzi, European Web Services|
1. Source: Absolute Zero United
He’s been featured in cartoon images on sites like deviantART in approved child rape scenarios. He’s been spray painted in parks in lewd fashion to mock the dangers children face from watchful pedophiles. His popularity has seeped so deeply into the hearts and minds of young teen girls, they have been seen on YouTube laughing about being 3 year olds being raped by their toys they name after him — popularity cleverly obtained through skillful persuasion by pedophiles pretending to be other teens on sites like Chan. His puppet masters have even been so good at getting pedophile’s access to children and access to ignorant teens, the terrorists have even used him to gather young jihadists.
After at least three years of being a viable threat, the San Diego police department, followed now by the other states, is finally recognizing Pedo Bear as a very real threat of sexual predators of children. I guess better late than never, although, tell that to the children and families who have fallen victim to the antics of his handlers during this time.
I have posted about him before and I was part of a task force that watched vigilantly and turned in to the FBI individuals on deviantART for their explicit use of PedoBear in images and stories about child rape. Images and stories deviantART admins said were protected under free speech, although the friends of those posting these images and these stories were minors being subjected to pedophile paraphernalia and befriended by individuals on the site who blogged frequently that “sex with a child is a beautiful thing.” Groups set up to petition the banning of PedoBear were removed by Admin, though the child rape scenarios were allowed to stay. This is when the FBI intervened and set up a monitoring task force still in place today. Makes me wonder why the local police departments have dragged their feet on this very real concern, but nevertheless, they are finally seeing the threat for what it is and taking action.
Tulsa Police Department Child Exploitation Unit
A Public Safety Information Bulletin
What’s a Pedo Bear?
First, some definitions:
Pedophile – one affected with pedophilia
Pedophilia – sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object (thanks Merriam-Webster)
Internet Meme – a image, catchphrase or concept that spreads rapidly from person to person via the internet, largely through internet-based email, blogs, forums, imageboards, social networking sites and instant messaging
In recent years, PedoBear, Pedo being a shortened version of Pedophile, started as an “Internet meme”. PedoBear originated in Japan as a cartoon meme, known for his lecherous nature towards prepubescent children. Multiple Internet postings and photos are available of PedoBear.
The Internet postings and photographs, some photo-shopped and some not, refer to children in a sexually provocative manner. His cute face and non-threatening appearance negate the truth of his sinister, much darker side.
In fact, one of the things that make PedoBear popular is the controversy surrounding his licentious love of little girls. PedoBear is and should be associated with the Internet and pedophiles/sexually-preferential offenders who reportedly use him to communicate their interests in young children to each other.
At the San Diego Comic Con 2010 in July of this year, law enforcement discovered an individual dressed in a PedoBear costume, handing out candy and being photographed in contact with attendees, including multiple children. Once identified, the young man and his costume were excluded from the family-friendly event.
Following this introduction to PedoBear, it was found that his attendance was documented in photographs, which were readily available on the internet. And his presence is not restricted to this particular event.
This use of an otherwise family-friendly event for malignant means became obvious, when looking at the pictures and realizing their context. Disguised as innocence, this underground community that would make victims of our children, teasingly reaches out into the light of day. Law enforcement’s concern is what their ultimate intentions could be.
Since the Comic Con, law enforcement in San Diego, with this new knowledge of PedoBear’s existence, has come across PedoBear’s image in situations during which they were contacting those that exploit and/or abuse children.
The intention of this bulletin is to make the community aware of Pedo Bear’s image both on the Internet and in reality, and alert citizens that his presence may be an indicator of the presence of individuals who have a predilection to sexually inappropriate, or even, assaultive behavior.
While not an absolute, the image of PedoBear should be a sign that you should use caution with whatever situation you are in or the individuals involved.
Be aware of your community events and the elements who might be lurking at them.
It should be noted that PedoBear’s presence was neither condoned nor promoted by the Comic Con organization or staff, nor the San Diego Convention Center. Both have been supportive with law enforcement efforts with regards to this information.
For concerns in your particular community, please contact your local law enforcement agency.
220.127.116.112010/07/09 at 4:14 am
Hey everyone, I this website for nudism [link removed by editor]. It is a new website to look at all kinds of uncensored teenagers, kids that live their life in a nudist community. Can anyone tell me if it’s a good site too go to or if its just another scam. I thought it was solid because none of the torrent sites carry anything like this….”
This same site and others like it have come to my attention many times, and I report it to LE each and every time. It is another example of sexual predators being everywhere and another lesson on the necessity of safeguarding our children. Sites like these offering photos of nudist colony residents and nude beaches are NOT authorized to sell or share these photos, unless the particular nudist colony is one that should be raided by the FBI. There is no other purpose to sharing nudist colony photos to non-nudist colony society than for sinister reasons, especially images of children.
These sites feature non-nudist colony images, as well, many of which appear to have been stolen or snapped in secret. For instance, on such sites I have seen photos of children in very skimpy swimwear – dry and wet, images of little girls beneath the cleaning showers at public pools, images of what others would believe are innocent bath time photos, images of children playing in front yards in sprinklers, etc…
Most parents have such photos and see nothing more than the joy on their beloved child’s face of playing in water and soap suds. Family memories become sexual predator fantasy when those photos are developed at a public photo lab or posted online in photo sharing sites and on social networking sites.
Never believe “private” settings make a difference. They don’t. There is always a way around those and online predators know all of them.
Furthermore, unless your entire friends list on your social networking page consists of people you know in real life and would trust alone with your child, and unless your page is set to the privacy of only being viewed by these people, you are offering your child up to pedophiles in your midst.
Where do you think all the photos come from that are found in convicted sex offender’s computers if not for ignorant parents behaving so haphazardly with their child’s safety?
THINK: Would you want someone posting images of your naked body all over the net to complete strangers? Why do it to your child?!
The reason the poster of the comment is inquiring as to this site’s validity is because he/she wants to know if the site is a sting operation or if it is the real deal. The reason this person posted a comment here on my site is because pedophiles, particularly overseas, frequently confuse my site with one in their network. This person tried to post this comment on one of my Alice Day posts, believing it was a post celebrating Alice Day. Idiots run rampant and thankfully, more so in the pedophile community.
More on the crime of child pornography and how you can be prepared and protect your children: http://www.fbi.gov/innocent.htm
If you come across such sites offering images of nude children, teens, or anyone that appears unauthorized (nude children and teens are ALWAYS unauthorized and illegal!), please report that site using the following links: